Cases 21 - 30 of 35
USA v. Cassius Hollin
as 10-3681
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CASSIUS ALLEN HOLLINS, a/k/a Casius Hollins, Cassius Hollins, "Cash"
HOLLINS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75222
Plaintiff:
WARSELL D. HOLLINS
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLLINS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40042
Plaintiff:
WARSELL D. HOLLINS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
LEE v. CARR et al
as 3:2009cv04729
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEE and CHARLES LEE
Defendant:
ROBERT O. CARR, ROBERT H.B. BALDWIN, MITCHELL L. HOLLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
MIELE v. CARR et al
as 3:2009cv04687
Plaintiff:
PAUL MIELE and PAUL MIELE
Defendant:
ROBERT O. CARR, ROBERT H.B. BALDWIN, MITCHELL L. HOLLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
KIRKHAM v. CARR et al
as 3:2009cv03444
Plaintiff:
ERIC KIRKHAM
Defendant:
ROBERT O. CARR, MITCHELL L. HOLLIN, ROBERT H. NIEHAUS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
RBC BANK (USA) v. RILEY, RIPER, HOLLIN & COLAGRECO et al
as 3:2009cv00431
Plaintiff:
RBC BANK (USA)
Defendant:
RILEY, RIPER, HOLLIN & COLAGRECO and EDWARD J. HOLLIN, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HOLLINS v. NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv83750
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. HOLLINS
Defendant:
NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HOLLINS v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75694
Plaintiff:
EVA HOLLINS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
