Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Kostyshyn v. Markell et al
as 1:2016cv00921
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
Jack Markell, Matthew Denn, Robert Coupe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noble v. The State of Delaware et al
as 1:2016mc00188
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Noble
Defendant:
The State of Delaware and Jack Markell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Thomas Noble
as 16-2915
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS E. NOBLE
Defendant - Respondent:
DIRECTOR DELAWARE DIVISION OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Nominal Respondent:
SUE L. ROBINSON
Noble v. The State of Delaware et al
as 1:2016cv00407
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Noble
Defendant:
The State of Delaware and Jack Markell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn v. Markell et al
as 1:2016cv00235
Petitioner:
Peter Kostyshyn
Respondent:
Jack Markell, Matt Denn and David Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas Noble v. Warden James T. Vaughn Correct, et al
as 16-1761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
DIANE C. STREET, M. JANE BRADY, ABIGAIL LAYTON and others
In re: Thomas E. Noble
as 16-1508
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Defendant - Respondent:
WARDEN DAVID PIERCE, DIANE C. STREET, M. JANE BRADY and others
Nominal Respondent:
SUE L. ROBINSON
Noble v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv00043
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Noble
Respondent:
David Pierce, Diane Streett, M. Jane Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ali v. Markell et al
as 1:2015cv01184
Plaintiff:
Shamsidin Ali
Defendant:
Jack Markell, Robert Coupe, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alston v. Governor of State of Delaware Jack Markel et al
as 1:2015cv00235
Plaintiff:
Eshed Alston
Defendant:
Governor of State of Delaware Jack Markel, State DOJ, Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
