Cases 21 - 30 of 51
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51845
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JONES, SR. v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67437
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. JONES, SR.
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Jones v. Michael Curley, et al
as 11-3207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES RAY JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CURLEY, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
JONES SR. et al v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, PABCO INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIV.
as 2:2011cv66894
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. JONES SR. and JAQUELINE L. JONES
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, PABCO INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIV.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66512
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. JONES
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65951
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. JONES and ANNIE PEARL JONES
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60459
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. JONES and BETTY JEAN JONES
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , H.K. PORTER COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54854
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
JONES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv04197
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. JONES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA., PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75482
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. JONES
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
