Cases 21 - 30 of 280
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
LEE v. UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv06750
Plaintiff:
ALLEN LEE
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LLC, John Does 1-5 and John Does 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CARABALLO v. LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY E.C.W. LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04689
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS B CARABALLO
Defendant:
LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY E.C.W. LLC, RYAN DUCKERS, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
WALKER v. HD SUPPLY MANAGEMENT INC. et al
as 1:2022cv04524
Plaintiff:
XAVIER T WALKER
Defendant:
HD SUPPLY MANAGEMENT INC., JOHN DOES 1-5 and JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
