Cases 21 - 30 of 295
Jones v. Shah
as 1:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Dr. Syed Shah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00904
Petitioner:
Joseph Jones
Respondent:
Robert May and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. CIRCOR International, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
CIRCOR International, Inc., Helmuth Ludwig, Samuel R. Chapin and others
Wilmington Food Not Bombs et al v. Jennings et al
as 1:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Food Not Bombs, Madison Daley and George Jones
Defendant:
Kathy Jennings and City of Wilmington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawrence v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, Frederick A. Henderson, William F. Austen and others
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Sharon Shienice Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00592
Defendant:
Sanofi U.S. Services Inc., Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Myra Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edelmann et al v. John Doe New Castle County Police Officer No. 1 et al
as 1:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Craig Edelmann, Elizabeth Jones and Aida Pabon
Defendant:
John Doe New Castle County Police Officer No. 1, Vaughan M. Bond, Jr. and New Castle County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Protective Life Insurance Company v. Welch et al
as 1:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Protective Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kerry Welch, Michael Jones and David Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Jones v. Univar Solutions Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Univar Solutions Inc., Christopher D. Pappas, David Jukes and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
