Cases 21 - 30 of 74
HOLLOMAN v. COLVIN
as 2:2013cv03804
Plaintiff:
ANTOWON HOLLOMAN
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CERCIELLO v. SEBELIUS, ET AL
as 5:2013cv03249
Plaintiff:
MARK J. CERCIELLO
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS and ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2013cv03119
Plaintiff:
MILAGROS MARTINEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MURNAGHAN et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2013cv03083
Plaintiff:
JANET MURNAGHAN and FRANCIS MURNAGHAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Athens Healthcare, Inc. v. Sebelius et al
as 3:2013cv01443
Plaintiff:
Athens Healthcare, Inc.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , Marilyn Tavenner and Beverly Mackereth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
HAYES v. SEBELIUS
as 2:2013cv02922
Plaintiff:
JEROME A. HAYES
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
YOUNKERS v. SEBELIUS
as 2:2013cv02809
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE J. YOUNKERS
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DIEHL v. SEBELIUS
as 2:2013cv02506
Plaintiff:
GLORIA LYNN DIEHL
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
SPONSLER v. SEBELIUS
as 2:2013cv02264
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SPONSLER, JR.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DOMBROWSKI v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
PATRICK C. DOMBROWSKI
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
