Cases 21 - 30 of 17,852
Deady v. Owens-Illinois, et al
as 2:2021cv60002
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Deady and Rita Deady
Defendant:
Inc. Owens-Illinois, OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY and KEENE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
RZONCA v. BOROUGH OF PARKESBURG, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv01791
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. RZONCA
Defendant:
JOHN P. COLDIRON, WENDY KEEGAN, JOHN P. HAGAN, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keens v. Saul
as 4:2020cv02135
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Johnonna Jo Keens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BARBACKI v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC
as 2:2020cv60000
Plaintiff:
NELLIE BARBACKI and ARTHUR R. BARBACKI
Defendant:
EMPIRE ACE INSULATION MANUFACTURING CORP., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC and KEENE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION
as 2:2020cv60009
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. GILMARTIN, JANE R. GILMARTIN and WENDY MILLER
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, KEENE CORPORATION and W.R. GRACE & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRASK v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2020cv60016
Defendant:
EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
ADA C. TRASK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CICONE v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2020cv60004
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC., KEENE CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD F CICONE and CLAIRE E. CICONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROMANELLO v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2020cv60014
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC., KEENE CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
GIULIO ROMANELLO and ANTONIA ROMANELLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAMON v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.
as 2:2020cv60006
Plaintiff:
CLARA DAMON
Defendant:
KEENE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
