Cases 21 - 28 of 28
MCMILLEN v. EMPIRE ACE INSULATION MANUFACTURING CO. et al
as 2:2009cv74634
Plaintiff:
GRADY F. MCMILLEN
Defendant:
EMPIRE ACE INSULATION MANUFACTURING CO., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Timothy Hale v. McMillen, et al
as 09-2737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY A. HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
MCMILLEN, LYNN EATON, VANCE and others
MCMILLEN v. AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2009cv69476
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR D MCMILLEN
Defendant:
AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCMILLEN v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv68479
Plaintiff:
HOWARD C. MCMILLEN, HOWARD C. MCMILLEN, HOWARD C. MCMILLEN and others
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCMILLEN v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv68327
Plaintiff:
HOWARD C. MCMILLEN, HOWARD C. MCMILLEN, HOWARD C. MCMILLEN and others
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hale v. McMillen et al
as 3:2007cv01701
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Hale
Defendant:
McMillen, Lynn Eaton, Lt. Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMILLEN ENGINEERING, INC. v. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv01084
Plaintiff:
MCMILLEN ENGINEERING, INC.
Defendant:
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY and NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
MCMILLEN et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66731
Plaintiff:
TOMMY GENE MCMILLEN and PATRICIA ANN MCMILLEN
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
