Cases 21 - 30 of 34
MEDRANO v. SPRAYGROUND LLC. et al
as 3:2012cv06334
Plaintiff:
PEDRO MEDRANO
Defendant:
SPRAYGROUND LLC., EDWARD SHABOT and DAVID BEN DAVID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MEDRANO v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv49182
Plaintiff:
ARTEMIO B. MEDRANO
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MEDRANO v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv45783
Plaintiff:
JUAN MEDRANO
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CERNA-MEDRANO v. HOLDER
as 3:2011cv04368
Petitioner:
EDGARDO ALEJANDRO CERNA-MEDRANO
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MEDRANO v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2011cv00721
Plaintiff:
ISMAEL MEDRANO, SR.
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MEDRANO v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06391
Plaintiff:
JOSE MEDRANO
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MEDRANO v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76293
Plaintiff:
JUAN MEDRANO
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEDRANO v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67652
Plaintiff:
JULIO MEDRANO
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , A & M INSULATION CO. , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEDRANO et al v. ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv67045
Plaintiff:
MIKE MEDRANO, MIKE MEDRANO, CONSUELO MEDRANO and others
Defendant:
ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
