Cases 21 - 30 of 75
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC et al v. WALKER
as 2:2017cv05635
Petitioner:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC and MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY FA NOTES HOLDINGS LLC
Respondent:
STEPHEN TODD WALKER
Appellant:
GARY GREEN
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0007
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC v. FITZGERALD
as 1:2017cv12866
Plaintiff:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC
Defendant:
JOHN FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pokego et al v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney
as 3:2017cv02225
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pokego and Ruth Pokego
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC et al v. CONNELL
as 2:2017cv11701
Petitioner:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC and MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY FA NOTES HOLDINGS LLC
Respondent:
BARRY F. CONNELL
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC v. BEYLICKJIAN
as 3:2017cv07951
Defendant:
ROBERT BEYLICKJIAN
Plaintiff:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC v. NELLIGAN
as 2:2017cv04441
Defendant:
JOSEPH NELLIGAN
Plaintiff:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Morgan Stanley Smith
as 17-1590
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY KUHN, NICK PONTILENA, HOWARD ROSENBLATT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC and MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC et al v. SESHADRI
as 2:2016cv09597
Petitioner:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC and MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY FA NOTES HOLDINGS LLC
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER ADAM SESHADRI
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC et al v. PATAUDI
as 3:2016cv09461
Petitioner:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC and MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY FA NOTES HOLDINGS LLC
Respondent:
MANOJ PATAUDI
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
