Cases 31 - 40 of 9,840
Stone v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Marc Stone
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BURSTON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02130
Plaintiff:
DARRICK BURSTON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Neuberger et al v. Delaware Department of Safety and Homeland Security et al
as 1:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Thomas S. Neuberger, Jerry L. Martin, William R. Hague, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Safety and Homeland Security, Nathanial McQueen, Jr. and Col. Melissa Zebley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. KOLENOVIC et al
as 1:2024cv06212
Defendant:
DJULIA KOLENOVIC and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KOLENOVIC v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv06213
Plaintiff:
DJULIA KOLENOVIC
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PHOENIX SALES AND SERVICE CORP. v. TELIS ELECTRONIC SERVICES, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv06220
Plaintiff:
PHOENIX SALES AND SERVICE CORP.
Defendant:
TELIS Electronic Services, Inc. and Martin Yoemans
Daugherty v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
Lisa B. Daugherty
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SAMPSON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02055
Plaintiff:
DEREK LEROY SAMPSON
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bhatti v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Sumaira Bhatti
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ESTATE OF SARAH MARTIN SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06086
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF SARAH MARTIN SMITH and MICHAEL CHAPPLE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., KENVUE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
