Cases 31 - 40 of 173
MOORE et al v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2020cv19621
Plaintiff:
SHAQUAN RUSH and DEVONTE MOORE
Defendant:
OFFICER RAYMOND VAZQUEZ, CHIEF, JC POLICE MICHAEL KELLY, OFFICER MICHAEL JACOBO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv17555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CROSS RIVER FIBER LLC v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY
as 2:2020cv05881
Plaintiff:
CROSS RIVER FIBER LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251
DOS SANTOS v. ABAD et al
as 2:2020cv01087
Defendant:
IRWIN ROSEN, SCALIA, MIKE KELLY and others
Plaintiff:
AARAO DOS SANTOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEKRILOV et al v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY
as 2:2019cv22182
Plaintiff:
JAYU JEN, KWAN HO TANG, ALAN SUEN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
FIGUEROA v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2019cv20993
Defendant:
LIBERTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC., ABC ENTITIES 1-5, FORMER POLICE CHIEF PHILIP D. ZACCHE, in his official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff:
FLORENCIO FIGUEROA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CITY OF NEWARK v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al
as 2:2019cv20931
Defendant:
Steven Banks, CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, Bill De Blasio and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, a Municipal Corporation and CITY OF NEWARK
Intervenor Plaintiff:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv20898
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv20834
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv20662
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
