Cases 31 - 40 of 127
Lauk v. Solera Global Holding Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv01718
Defendant:
Does 1 through 50 inclusive, Solera Holdings, Inc. and Solera Global Holding Corp.
Plaintiff:
Kurt Lauk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORENO v. HSBC BANK, USA et al
as 2:2019cv09223
Defendant:
DOES 1 TO 50 and HSBC BANK, USA
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ENRIQUE MORENO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORENO v. HSBC BANK, USA et al
as 2:2019cv09103
Defendant:
DOES 1 TO 50 and HSBC BANK, USA
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ENRIQUE MORENO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUMMERALL v. CITI BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv02196
Defendant:
DOES 1 TO 50 and CITI BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
DONALDA SUMMERALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONAGHAN v. COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2018cv15166
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 50, AUGUST E. KNESTAUT and COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER
Plaintiff:
JAMES MONAGHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FORD v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE et al
as 2:2017cv07034
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FORD
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, U.S. BANK, N. A. and DOES 1 TO 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION, LP v. PSEG POWER, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05101
Plaintiff:
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION, LP
Defendant:
PSEG POWER, LLC, JANE AND JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 50 and ABC BUSINESS ENTITIES 1 THROUGH 50
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
ATKINSON v. REMI CAPITAL, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv02477
Plaintiff:
DAVID ATKINSON
Defendant:
REMI CAPITAL, INC., COUNTRYWIDE MORTGAGE, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
7 Eleven Inc v. Karamjeet Sodhi, et al
as 17-1262
Plaintiff - Appellee:
7 ELEVEN INC
Defendant - Appellant:
KARAMJEET SODHI
Defendant - Appellee:
MANJINDER SINGH, KARAMJIT SINGH and DOES 1 THROUGH 50 INCLUSIVE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
