Cases 31 - 40 of 252
Banks v. Justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court et al
as 1:2020cv00660
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Warden Allegheny County Jail, Hon. Dougherty and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS V TURKEY ET AL
as 2:2020cv00453
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, SYRIA, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2020cv00441
Respondent:
RICH FITZGERALD, ORLANDO HARPER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Fitzgerald et al
as 1:2020cv00501
Respondent:
Rich Fitzgerald, Orlando Harper, United States Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Turkey et al
as 1:2020cv00441
Respondent:
Orlando Harper, Syria, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv00091
Respondent:
MARVIN MILLER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NOREEN A. RE and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv01685
Respondent:
CONNIE CLARK, ORLANDO HARPEN, DENNIS WALKER and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks v. Clark et al
as 1:2019cv02226
Respondent:
Connie Clark, Orlando Harpen, Dennis Walker and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BANKS v. LONDON BRIDGE KNIFE ATTACK et al
as 2:2019cv21863
Respondent:
CITY OF LONDON, ORLANDO HARPER, MAYOR, JERSEY CITY, NJ and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv01428
Respondent:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
