Cases 31 - 40 of 135
NOVALEZ v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2017cv01128
Plaintiff:
BRAHULIO NOVALEZ
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, MICHAEL SPICER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALLORY v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00983
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MALLORY
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO , MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00833
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CLARK
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGHEE et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00832
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL MCGHEE and ELIGA MCGHEE
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONZALEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00813
Plaintiff:
LEROY GONZALEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO , MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
TENAGLIA et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
DAVID TENAGLIA
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JEFFREY WALKER, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOUIE v. SPEISER et al
as 2:2017cv00056
Plaintiff:
KYLE SAMULE BOUIE
Defendant:
JONATHAN SPEISER , BRIAN REYNOLDS , THOMAS LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWENS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv06696
Plaintiff:
SHANTA BOWENS , MAUREEN TRAINA , ANDREW CARROLL and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, THOMAS LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOMAX v. SPEISER et al
as 2:2016cv06367
Plaintiff:
KEVIN Z. LOMAX
Defendant:
JOHN SPEISER, LINWOOD NORMAN, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CENTUOLO v. SPICER et al
as 2:2016cv05430
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS CENTUOLO
Defendant:
MICHAEL SPICER , OFFICER JOHN DOE 1, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
