Cases 31 - 40 of 727
MOHAMMED v. JAGUAR LAND ROVER NA LLC
as 2:2023cv11859
Plaintiff:
IBRAHIM MOHAMMED
Defendant:
JAGUAR LAND ROVER NA LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. WEINSTEIN et al
as 3:2023cv03848
Plaintiff:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ELIYAHU WEINSTEIN, ARYEH L. BROMBERG, JOEL L. WITTELS and others
Shenisa Mohammed v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-2219
Petitioner:
SHENISA MOHAMMED
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
CUBBY, ESQ. v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2023cv02842
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. CUBBY, ESQ.
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF PASSAIC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ABDOU et al v. INNOVATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS, INC.
as 2:2023cv01724
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE ABDOU and MOHAMED Y. ABDOU
Defendant:
INNOVATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS, INC. and KINLEY BLAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
SALEH v. UDEMY, INC.
as 2:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED SALEH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and MOHAMED SALEH
Defendant:
UDEMY, INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
