Cases 31 - 40 of 43
PIMENTEL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv50745
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO PIMENTEL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PIMENTEL v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2011cv00472
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ORESTES PIMENTEL
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIMENTEL et al v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2010cv06299
Petitioner:
VIGEL E. PIMENTEL, MARIO A. CABRERA, JUAN J. DIAZ and others
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JOHN TSOUKARIS, DOUGLAS HENKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PIMENTEL et al v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2010cv06067
Petitioner:
VIGEL E. PIMENTEL, MARIO A. CABRERA, JUAN J. DIAZ and others
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JOHN TSOUKARIS, DOUGLAS HENKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PIMENTEL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54006
Plaintiff:
LUIS R. PIMENTEL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
POTTER v. FRASER et al
as 3:2010cv04200
Plaintiff:
ERIC POTTER
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. FRASER, BAKER, JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIMENTEL v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 2:2010cv03724
Petitioner:
JOSE PIMENTEL
Respondent:
JANET NAPOLITANO and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PIMENTEL v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72210
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO PIMENTEL
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIMENTEL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv30390
Plaintiff:
RAUL J. PIMENTEL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
PIMENTEL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv30562
Plaintiff:
VICENTE PIMENTEL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
