Cases 31 - 38 of 38
DARRACH v. ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv05374
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D. DARRACH
Defendant:
ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA , ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY , ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mattus et al v. The Allstate Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00681
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Mattus and Paul A. Mattus Agency & Sons, Inc.
Defendant:
The Allstate Corporation and The Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCLEAN v. THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
CORY MCLEAN
Defendant:
THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
STEHLE-ROSELLINI v. ALLSTATE CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00895
Plaintiff:
SALLY ANN STEHLE-ROSELLINI
Defendant:
ALLSTATE CORPORATION and ALLSTATE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
WebXchange Inc. v. Allstate Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00131
Plaintiff:
WebXchange Inc.
Defendant:
Allstate Corporation, Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Rule 43 Substitution:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Party - Amicus Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PALOMBI v. THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION
as 2:2007cv01450
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PALOMBI
Defendant:
THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
ROMERO, et al v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE, et al
as 2:2001cv03894
Plaintiff:
GENE R. ROMERO , JAMES T. BEVER , RICHARD A. CARRIER and others
Defendant:
EDWARD M. LIDDY , ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION
Movant:
EEOC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
