Cases 31 - 40 of 1,256
USA v. Rudys Torres
as 24-1042
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RUDYS OSVALDO TORRES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
TORRES v. CHETIRKIN
as 3:2023cv22350
Petitioner:
ANGEL T. TORRES and NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL
Defendant:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
TORRES v. WALMART, INC et al
as 2:2023cv23124
Plaintiff:
MARIA TORRES
Defendant:
WALMART, INC, WALMART STORES, INC., 300-400 PARK PLAZA DR. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv21168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Torres v. USA
as 1:2023cv01418
Petitioner:
David Torres
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
TORRES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC., et al
as 3:2023cv21626
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA TORRES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.,, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv21305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
