Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Luis Batiz, et al v. M.D. Brown, et al
as 16-2698
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS BATIZ and CORDELIA CHALLENGER
Defendant - Appellee:
M.D. BROWN, NEW JERSEY STATE TROOPER #7090 and D.K. DETULLIO, NEW JERSEY STATE TROOPER #7193
Luis Batiz, et al v. M.D. Brown, et al
as 15-3637
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LUIS BATIZ
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORDELIA CHALLENGER
Defendant - Appellee:
M.D. BROWN, New Jersey State Trooper #7090, D.K. DETULLIO, New Jersey State Trooper #7193 and JOHN DOES NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE TROOPERS 1-5
R.K., et al v. Clifton Board of Education
as 13-2212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R.K. and D.K., individually, and on behalf of R.K.
Defendant - Appellee:
CLIFTON BOARD OF EDUCATION
R.K. et al v. CLIFTON BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2011cv06231
Plaintiff:
R.K. and D.K.
Defendant:
CLIFTON BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. D.K. ENTERPRISES et al
as 2:2010cv05731
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
D.K. ENTERPRISES, YOGESH PATEL and DEENA D. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONNOR v. DAVOL INC. et al
as 2:2008cv04540
Plaintiff:
JUDITH D.K. CONNOR
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. D.K. ENTERPRISES et al
as 2:2008cv02133
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
D.K. ENTERPRISES, YOGESH PATEL and D.D. PATEL
Cause Of Action: Diversity
D.K. v. MONROE TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 1:2007cv01877
Plaintiff:
D.K.
Defendant:
MONROE TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT and ROBERT TERRILL
Movant:
South Jersey Newspapers t/a The Gloucester County Times
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
