Cases 41 - 50 of 70
FINNEMAN v. MAURICE et al
as 1:2016cv01368
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNEMAN
Defendant:
MAURICE, JOHN BUJANOWSKI, JAMAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOGLISCI v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv02846
Plaintiff:
JANINE LOGLISCI
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BYRD v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv04501
Plaintiff:
JANINE BYRD
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BAYER OY and BAYER PHARMA AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PITTMAN v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2014cv01568
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, EVELYN CRUZ CAROFILIS, KATHIE DEFURIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LATZ et al v. FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv07923
Plaintiff:
JANINE LATZ and GLEN LATZ
Defendant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv07354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WALKER v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2013cv06642
Plaintiff:
JANINE WALKER
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COSTANTINO v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY et al
as 1:2013cv06667
Plaintiff:
JANINE COSTANTINO
Defendant:
CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY , STERLING WHEATEN, JOSEPH GAROFALO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
