Cases 41 - 50 of 3,925
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02667
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02666
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Jones v. Department of Defense et al
as 1:2024cv00990
Defendant:
Office of the Secretary of Defense and Joint Staff, Department of Defense, Nation Security Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Selective Way Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv02594
Plaintiff:
Amy Jones
Defendant:
Selective Way Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02575
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
AISHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02525
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02518
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
MUHAMMAD v. ARMFIELD et al
as 2:2024cv02553
Respondent:
WILBUR JONES, JAMES ARMFIELD, JAMES CLACK and others
Petitioner:
WALID ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SANTIAGO v. PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BNI AGENT JONES BADGE 659 et al
as 2:2024cv02484
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BNI AGENT JONES BADGE 659 and BNI AGENT JOHN/JANE DOE 1 - 10
Plaintiff:
DAVID T. SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
