Cases 41 - 50 of 202
CLARK v. CLARK et al
as 2:2021cv00061
Respondent:
EUGENE A. VITTONE, II, JOSH SHAPIRO and MICHAEL CLARK
Petitioner:
MELVIN R. CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARTIN v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv00065
Defendant:
MIKE SNIDER, LISA SHERRETTS, MICHELE THARP and others
Plaintiff:
HOWARD HENRY MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sears v. Clark et al
as 1:2020cv02305
Petitioner:
Richard Sears
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General Office, Michael Clark and Tony Matulewicz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DANIELS v. CLARK et al
as 2:2021cv00128
Petitioner:
SEAN DANIELS
Respondent:
DEBORAH L. CARPENTER, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sims v. Clark et al
as 1:2020cv02246
Respondent:
Bruce Beemer and Michael Clark
Petitioner:
Roderick Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PELZER V. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00325
Defendant:
(STGMU) SUPT. D. OVERMYER, SUPT. LEWIS FOLINO, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
CAINE PELZER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GEORGE v. SMOCK et al
as 1:2020cv00320
Defendant:
PA STROUP, MS. JERI SMOCK, CHCA, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EARL GEORGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WARING v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv05494
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
MACEO EMERSON WARING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MADISON v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv01655
Respondent:
STEPHEN P. STEINER, JOHN WETZEL, PAROLE AGENT DAREK EBERHARDT and others
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE J. MADISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCRAE v. PIERSON et al
as 1:2020cv00318
Defendant:
HEARING EXAMINER R. SZELEWSKI, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CLARK and SGT. K. PIERSON
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCRAE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
