Cases 41 - 50 of 63
NAIL v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 2:2012cv06925
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. NAIL, JR.
Defendant:
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BOSTIC et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv05474
Plaintiff:
JOE EARL BOSTIC, JR. , JAMI BOSTIC , WENDELL H. DAVIS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CUI v. KIM'S REJOICING NAILS AND COSMETICS INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01244
Plaintiff:
DONGCHENG CUI
Defendant:
KIM'S REJOICING NAILS AND COSMETICS INC. , SEUNG DUK KIM and CHUL WOONG KIM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
NAILS v. DIRECT LOANS
as 2:2012cv00578
Plaintiff:
ANGELA NAILS
Defendant:
DIRECT LOANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nails v. Direct Loans
as 3:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Direct Loans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEE v. KIM'S REJOICING NAILS AND COSMETICS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07555
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE Y. LEE
Defendant:
KIM'S REJOICING NAILS AND COSMETICS, INC. and CHUL WUNG KIM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nail v. Lenear et al
as 1:2011cv02338
Plaintiff:
Prentice E. Nail
Defendant:
Connie Lenear and Jack Schott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nail Issa El Khatib v. Atty Gen USA
as 11-4238
Petitioner:
NAIL ISSA EL KHATIB
Respondent:
ATTY GEN USA
MYCONE DENTAL SUPPLY CO., INC. v. CREATIVE NAIL DESIGN, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv04380
Plaintiff:
MYCONE DENTAL SUPPLY CO., INC.
Defendant:
CREATIVE NAIL DESIGN, INC. , BEAUTY SYSTEMS GROUP, LLC , EAST COAST SALON SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
ADVANCED MULTILEVEL CONCEPTS, INC. et al v. BUKSTEL et al
as 2:2011cv03718
Plaintiff:
ADVANCED MULTILEVEL CONCEPTS, INC. , ABLE DIRECT MARKETING INC. , KEN NAIL and others
Defendant:
EDWARD BUKSTEL, VITAMINSPICE, INC., RICHARD F. SEELIG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
