Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06617
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05979
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-4275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-4211
Debtor - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05579
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Scottsdale Insurance v. Andrew Weiner, et al
as 10-1747
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE, as subrogee of Nickels Midway Pier, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW E. WEINER, JAY PETKOV, WILD WAVES LLC and others
Scottsdale Insurance v. Andrew Weiner, et al
as 10-1652
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE, as subrogee of Nickels Midway Pier, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDREW E. WEINER, JAY PETKOV and WILD WAVES LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
AMC PLUMBING & HEATING, DANIEL MULLEN, DAVID MULLEN, SR. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00141
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv06290
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
NICKEL v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76497
Plaintiff:
MARY E. NICKEL
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
