Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Matthew Ercoline, et al v. Unilever US Inc
as 11-2062
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MATTHEW ERCOLINE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNILEVER US INC
Appellant:
CASSANDRA SABOTA
VIRGINIA STREET FIDELCO, L.L.C. et al v. ORBIS PRODUCTS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv02057
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA STREET FIDELCO, L.L.C. and THE CITY OF NEWARK
Defendant:
ORBIS PRODUCTS CORPORATION, NORDA, INC., UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
CATANESE et al v. UNILEVER
as 2:2010cv05755
Plaintiff:
KELLI CATANESE , ROSS CORRIETTE and JAMES WALDRON
Defendant:
UNILEVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ERCOLINE v. UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC.
as 2:2010cv01747
Plaintiff:
MATHEW ERCOLINE
Defendant:
UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOLBY v. UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01432
Not Classified By Court:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Plaintiff:
MARY DOLBY, Cecil Kilgore and Bernice Williams
Defendant:
UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
VERCELLONO et al v. GERBER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv02350
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA VERCELLONO and DANIEL VERCELLONO
Defendant:
GERBER PRODUCTS COMPANY, HELENE CURTIS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SLAUGHTER v. UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC.
as 2:2009cv02072
Plaintiff:
JAMES SLAUGHTER and JAMES SLAUGHTER
Defendant:
UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
GENERAL REFRACTORIES v. STONE CONTAINER, et al
as 2:1999cv01341
Plaintiff:
GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY
Defendant:
STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION
Respondent:
PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA , MAYTAG CORPORATION , LANGER & GROGAN, P.C. and others
Movant:
CREST MEAT CO., INC. , FARMLAND FOODS, INC. , USG CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
