Cases 41 - 47 of 47
PURPURA et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 3:2010cv04814
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS E. PURPURA and DONALD R. LASTER, JR.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BREWER v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE et al
as 2:2010cv03204
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goudy-Bachman et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2010cv00763
Plaintiff:
Barbara Goudy-Bachman and Gregory Bachman
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, United States Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
BANDAWAT et al v. UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2008cv03935
Petitioner:
STEVEN J. BANDAWAT and PATRICIA BANDAWAT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
SCHUBERT et al v. GRAY et al
as 3:2007cv05926
Plaintiff:
AVROHOM SCHUBERT and ESTHER SCHUBERT
Defendant:
BRIAN GRAY, DANIEL MCCAULEY, HENRY M. PAULSON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
EXPRESS ENTERPRISE CORP. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
as 2:2007cv01865
Plaintiff:
EXPRESS ENTERPRISE CORP.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
