Cases 41 - 50 of 82
HARLAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv52690
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE L. HARLAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Fitzherbert v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv01310
Plaintiff:
Harlan Fitzherbert
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LAY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv36067
Plaintiff:
HARLAN G LAY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BELL et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2011cv04047
Plaintiff:
DAVID BELL, WILLIE F. BECKTON, VICTORIA DUPREE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BETHUNE et al v. A.C.S., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60506
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BETHUNE and HOWARD HARLAN BETHUNE
Defendant:
A.C.S., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARLAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00654
Plaintiff:
ZENETTA HARLAN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LENNON et al v. SMEAL et al
as 2:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
AARON JASON LENNON and TAXPAYERS, DISABILITY & S.S.I.'S
Defendant:
P.K. SMEAL, J.G. ECHART, F.R. ROYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARLAN et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81772
Plaintiff:
ELOISE M. HARLAN and DONALD L. HARLAN
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZIEL v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81699
Plaintiff:
HARLAN F. ZIEL
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
