Cases 41 - 50 of 741,035
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
TORRES v. HAROLD F. DAMPMAN, LTD. et al
as 2:2024cv02782
Plaintiff:
VINCENT ALEXANDER TORRES
Defendant:
HAROLD F. DAMPMAN, LTD. doing business as DAMPMAN FUNERAL SERVICES and HAROLD DAMPMAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00921
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MONTANO v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
WILFRIDO MONTANO
Respondent:
COLETTE PETERS and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
v. GIDDINGS et al
as 2:2024cv00922
Defendant:
LEVI GIDDINGS, LAUREL HARRY and TAMMY FERGERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wagner v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wagner
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., TRANS UNION, LLC, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
