Cases 51 - 60 of 247
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Erika Van Croft v. Conan Louis, et al
as 22-1131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIKA L. VAN CROFT
Defendant:
CONAN NOEL LOUIS, AKA Conan Noel Hamilton Louis
Defendant / Appellee:
MI RANCHO RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND and GAIL MICHELLE GILLIS LOUIS
Kaufmann v. Momentive Global Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
David Kaufmann
Defendant:
Momentive Global Inc., Susan L. Decker, David A. Ebersman and others
WHITFIELD v. MOMENTIVE GLOBAL, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
MOMENTIVE GLOBAL, INC., SUSAN L DECKER, DAVID EBERSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Morgan v. Momentive Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
Momentive Global, Inc., Susan L. Decker, David A. Ebersman and others
Erika Jacobs v. Geisinger Wyoming Medical Cent
as 21-3362
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERICA JACOBS and ERIKA JACOBS
Defendant / Appellee:
GEISINGER WYOMING VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
RODRIGUEZ v. CRAFT et al
as 1:2021cv20599
Plaintiff:
ERIKA Y. RODRIGUEZ
Cross Defendant:
DANIEL M. CRAFT, BYRON L. WHITE, JOSHUA E. REED and others
Cross Claimant:
KYLE S. DONLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROFT v. LOUIS et al
as 2:2021cv05074
Defendant:
CONAN NOEL LOUIS, CONAN NOEL HAMILTON LOUIS, MI RANCHO RESTAURANTS OR MARYLAND and others
Plaintiff:
ERIKA L. VAN CROFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRANADOS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
as 3:2021cv19547
Plaintiff:
ERIKA GRANADOS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Erika Hernandez-Zuniga v. Attorney General United States
as 21-2695
Petitioner:
ERIKA HERNANDEZ-ZUNIGA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
