Cases 51 - 60 of 271
WHITEHEAD v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX et al
as 1:2020cv16010
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WHITEHEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX et al
as 1:2020cv16012
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Plaintiff:
AARON WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANRING v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX et al
as 1:2020cv16014
Plaintiff:
JAMES MANRING
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX et al
as 1:2020cv15636
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Plaintiff:
YAHYA WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COFFIN v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX et al
as 1:2020cv15634
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Plaintiff:
JOHN COFFIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLY v. UNITED STATES et al.
as 1:2020cv13962
Plaintiff:
Toni Fly, Tony Fly, Toniya Fly and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, Joint Prisoner Transport Systems, U.S. Public Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STATEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2020cv12499
Petitioner:
VERNELL L. STATEN
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BINGHAM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv09775
Plaintiff:
CHANDAR BINGHAM
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FCI FORT DIX, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv09897
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CAPTAIN J. MILLER, MOHAMED MOAHAREK and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOUTH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2020cv09045
Plaintiff:
MS. JASON SOUTH and Anna
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
