Cases 51 - 60 of 89
BOYCE v. CHRISTIE et al
as 1:2012cv02323
Plaintiff:
COREY BOYCE
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, ERIC M. TAYLOR and CCCF DEPUTY WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYCE v. CHRISTIE et al
as 1:2012cv02321
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOYCE
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, ERIC M. TAYLOR and CCCF DEPUTY WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAH v. CHRISTIE et al
as 1:2012cv02118
Plaintiff:
ALIEO BAH
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, ERIC M. TAYLOR and C.C.C.F. DEPUTY WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CHRISTIE et al
as 1:2012cv02151
Plaintiff:
TOREESE BROWN
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, ERIC M. TAYLOR and C.C.C.F. DEPUTY WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2012cv01630
Plaintiff:
AKEEM FREEMAN
Defendant:
ERIC M. TAYLOR and THE MUNICIPALITY OF CAMDEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INFINITY PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY v. ESTATE OF JEREMY MICHAEL KRIEBEL et al
as 5:2011cv06307
Plaintiff:
INFINITY PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ESTATE OF JEREMY MICHAEL KRIEBEL, MATTHEW A. REAM , GEORGIA M. TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
TAYLOR v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2011cv05376
Plaintiff:
SCOTT TAYLOR
Defendant:
ERIC M. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv05655
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MOURATIDIS et al v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2011cv04359
Plaintiff:
LOUIE MOURATIDIS, JAVON O'NEAL and "INMATES" IN 3SB & 4SB IN & AT CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Defendant:
ERIC M. TAYLOR, CHRIS CHRISTIE and ANY & ALL ADMINISTRATION EMPLOYEE'S AT C.C.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONCHEWSKI v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2011cv02781
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS CONCHEWSKI
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN ERIC M. TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
