Cases 51 - 60 of 1,185
BOLICK et al v. CBS CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv00977
Plaintiff:
LEON BOLICK and MARGARET BOLICK
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION , LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION , UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. and others
Cross_claimant:
BOEING COMPANY , GOODRICH CORPORATION , HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
CBS CORPORATION and THE GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Malone et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00406
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company, Crown Cork & Seal Company Inc., Crane Co. and others
Cross Defendant:
Ingersoll Rand Company, Trane US Inc., Hopeman Brothers Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Riley Power Inc., FMC Corporation, Sterling Fluid Systems (USA) LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Haynes et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00607
Plaintiff:
Harold Haynes and Judy Haynes
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Aurora Pump Company , BorgWarner Morse TEC LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc. , FMC Corporation , Pfizer, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant:
CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
BROWN v. CATERPILLAR, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02687
Plaintiff:
BROWN and HAROLD BROWN
Defendant:
CATERPILLAR, INC, MCCORD CORPORATION, MACK TRUCKS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant - Appellee:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, as successor by merger to Buffalo Pump, Inc., ARVINMERITOR INC, FKA Arvin Industries Inc, individually and as successor by merger to Rockwell International, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, FKA Borg Warner Inc and others
Rose et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
David Rose and Freda Rose
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brandenburg et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01714
Plaintiff:
Rollin Brandenburg and Elaine Brandenburg
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , American Biltrite Co. , Atwood & Morrill Company Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
American Biltrite Co. , Aurora Pump Company and Cleaver-Brooks Inc.
Cross_defendant:
American Biltrite Co. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atwood & Morrill Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CAMPBELL v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66376
Defendant:
3M, COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC, GOODRICH CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JOWERS v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66516
Defendant:
3M, COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC, GOODRICH CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
DONNIE JOWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
