Cases 51 - 60 of 81
CALABRESE et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv18371
Plaintiff:
JAMES CALABRESE, GREGORY CABANILLAS and MATTHEW MECHANIC
Defendant:
RAISER, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SMITH v. KHOSROWSHAHI et al
as 2:2019cv04242
Plaintiff:
REINARD SMITH
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., BARNEY HARFORD, GARRETT CAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00675
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Route Guidance Systems LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00557
Plaintiff:
Route Guidance Systems LLC
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
Blackbird Tech LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00561
Plaintiff:
Blackbird Tech LLC and Blackbird Tech LLC doing business as Blackbird Technologies
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
AGABALOGUN et al v. BOLA et al
as 2:2019cv01161
Defendant:
JOHN DOE I THROUGH V, AMARJIT BOLA, UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EMI AGABALOGUN and ABDUL AGABALOGUN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AGABALOGUN et al v. BOLA et al
as 1:2019cv04453
Plaintiff:
EMI ABABALOGUN, ABDUL ABABALOGUN, EMI AGABALOGUN and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE I THROUGH V, AMARJIT BOLA, JAMES RIVER INSURANCE CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. RAMOS et al
as 2:2018cv15369
Defendant:
JERILYNN LANGWITH, DANIEL J WATERHOUSE, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KIRK C JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TORRES-FOUNTAIN v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 2:2018cv04515
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE TORRES-FOUNTAIN
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMILTON et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 2:2018cv00028
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , JAKIR HOSSAIN, USAA INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
MARIJEAN HAMILTON and CLAY TIDWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
