Cases 61 - 70 of 740,474
Serrano-Munoz v. USA
as 1:2024cv00993
Petitioner:
David Serrano-Munoz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stump v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Faith Stump
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mays v. Rattigan et al
as 3:2024cv00991
Plaintiff:
Keri Mays
Defendant:
Dadrian Rattigan and Rattigan Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
VAN v. RICARD
as 1:2024cv00994
Petitioner:
Andre Van
Respondent:
WARDEN Ricard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Castro-Mota v. Loveridge et al
as 3:2024cv00996
Petitioner:
Santos Castro-Mota
Respondent:
Leslie Loveridge, Michelle Henry, Robert Manzi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bouza v. FCI-Allenwood-Medium
as 4:2024cv00998
Petitioner:
William T. Bouza
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Allenwood-Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mays v. USP-Lewisburg et al
as 3:2024cv00999
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
USP-Lewisburg, A. Cotterall, Romig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. McGinley et al
as 4:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
Armoni Masud Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas McGinley, Keri Moore, Amy Wheary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Atherton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
Travis Warren Atherton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
