Cases 61 - 70 of 1,161
Novell v. Allergan, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02842
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, INC ., INAMED CORPORATION, ALLERGAN USA INC. and others
In Re:
ALLERGAN BIOCELL TEXTURED BREAST IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Shelby Novell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
HAYES v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2022cv02580
Plaintiff:
IDRIYS HAYES
Defendant:
E. THOMAS, K. MYERS, Z. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAHER et al v. BAUMEISTER & SAMUELS, P.C. et al
as 2:2022cv02054
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE MAHER, DANIEL R. MAHER and JOSEPH F. MAHER
Defendant:
BAUMEISTER & SAMUELS, P.C., MICHEL F. BAUMEISTER, DOROTHEA M. CAPONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HALVORSEN v. CALLAHAN et al
as 2:2022cv01683
Plaintiff:
SEAN HALVORSEN
Defendant:
COL PATRICK CALLAHAN and N.J. STATE POLICE JOHN DOE 1 TO 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
