Cases 61 - 70 of 271
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv01111
Defendant:
UNKNOWN NURSE #1, J. WILKS, CHOGOZIE IBE, PA and others
Plaintiff:
GARRETT DAVARRAS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AIKEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2020cv00600
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
LARRY WAYNE AIKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLOOM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv21589
Plaintiff:
IRA BLOOM
Defendant:
IAN CONNORS, MR. J. RAY ORMOND, MR. A. CHOPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WALSH v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv20921
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DAVID E. ORTIZ
Petitioner:
PATRICK STEPHEN WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RAGLAND v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2019cv20965
Plaintiff:
GERALD LYNN RAGLAND
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. OFC J. SALERNO et al
as 2:2019cv19926
Defendant:
OFC WONG, RRM F.B.O.P. PATRICK MCFARLAND, LT. EICHENRACH and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B ANDERSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINEO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2019cv19403
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
SADIN TINEO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GHAHARY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv19119
Defendant:
FEDERAL TRANSFER CENTER, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, US MARSHALLS SERVICE US MARSHALLS SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
DARIUS A GHAHARY and DARIUS F GHAHARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EADS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv18394
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JUSTIN EADS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAUNTLEROY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2019cv18126
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
DIONE FAUNTLEROY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
