Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Smith v. GC Services, LP
as 1:2010cv01060
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
GC Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCLELLAN et al V. ROBINSON et al
as 3:2010cv00827
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE MCLELLAN, SCOTT SAULER, RANDY STOKES and others
Defendant:
ALBERT M. "BO" ROBINSON, BROCKENBROUGH, CRANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodrigues v. Atty Gen USA
as 09-4077
Petitioner:
IAN B. RODRIGUES, AKA Michael Smith
Respondent:
ATTY GEN USA
SMITH v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO et al
as 2:2009cv91509
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH, MICHAEL SMITH and MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, BUFFALO PUMPS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MEGA CONCRETE, INC. et al v. SMITH et al
as 2:2009cv04234
Plaintiff:
MEGA CONCRETE, INC., MEGA CONCRETE, INC., MEGA SITEWORK, LLC and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL SMITH, PARAMOUNT CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC., PLUMBLINE CONSTRUCTION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SMITH et al v. TICKETMASTER ENTERTAINMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv02177
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH and ISA MACCUTCHEON
Defendant:
TICKETMASTER ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and TICKETSNOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
HAYES v. SMITH et al
as 1:2009cv00330
Plaintiff:
EDMOND A. HAYES
Defendant:
MICHAEL SMITH, KAREN SMITH, DISCOUNT HARRY'S and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SMITH v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv79491
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GULF BELTING & GASKET CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SMITH v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75624
Plaintiff:
LARRY MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SMITH v. COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv05679
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE, INC. and HASMUKH PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
