Cases 61 - 70 of 75
CLEMENTS v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv18579
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION 1-50, ALTRIA GROUP, INC., JUUL LABS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Mr KEVIN CLEMENTS and KEVIN CLEMENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HORVATH v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv18840
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HORVATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
S.R. v. JUUL LABS INC. et al
as 3:2019cv16659
Defendant:
FICTITIOUS DEFENDANTS 1-13, JUUL LABS INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
S.R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O. v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv16631
Defendant:
Fictitious Defendants 1-13, JUUL LABS, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
P. O.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01743
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROBINSON
Defendant:
PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv03572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PALMER v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv02624
Plaintiff:
MINNIE PALMER
Defendant:
PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., JENNIFER BIRD and DANIEL AFFRONTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. v. ESTEVEZ et al
as 2:2010cv01025
Plaintiff:
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC.
Defendant:
MIGUEL ESTEVEZ, ELBA SUAREZ, ROSA FLORES PAULINO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
HAUBRICH v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.
as 2:2009cv05867
Plaintiff:
MELANIE HAUBRICH
Defendant:
PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. v. REYES GROCERY INC. et al
as 2:2009cv05893
Plaintiff:
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC.
Defendant:
REYES GROCERY INC., MOHAMMED AHMED and DOES ONE through TEN, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
