Cases 61 - 70 of 76
PEREZ v. KEPHART et al
as 3:2013cv00269
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
DAVID KEPHART, TIMOTHY KEPHART, KEPHART TRUCKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
COMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS et al v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2013cv07213
Plaintiff:
COMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS , PINEROS Y CAMPESINOS UNIDOS DEL NOROESTE , NORTHWEST FOREST WORKER CENTER and others
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PEREZ , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ERIC M. SELEZNOW
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Perez v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv02949
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Thomas A. Clark, Central Pennsylvania Pulmonary Associates, LLC and Central Pennsylvania Pulmonary Associates, LLC 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. JAMES R. MACAULEY INC. et al
as 1:2013cv07341
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
JAMES R. MACAULEY INC. and GEORGE MACAULEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. HARRISON
as 3:2013cv07254
Petitioner:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Respondent:
MARK S. HARRISON
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
PEREZ v. COMMANDER CARBON SALARY SAVINGS PLAN
as 2:2013cv06791
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
COMMANDER CARBON SALARY SAVINGS PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. BELANGER et al
as 2:2013mc00262
Petitioner:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Respondent:
A. KENNETH BELANGER and BELANGER AND CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion for Enforcement
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06310
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
PEREZ v. MARINAKOS
as 2:2013mc00236
Petitioner:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Respondent:
PLATO A. MARINAKOS
Cause Of Action: Rule to Show Cause
Type:
Other Statutes
PEREZ v. BILLA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05671
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
BILLA CORPORATION and SANTOKH SINGH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
