Cases 61 - 70 of 275
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. CALI
as 2:2018cv15663
Defendant:
CHRISTINA CALI
Plaintiff:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PANNULLO v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
as 2:2018cv15252
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PANNULLO
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv15094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BRONSTEIN v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04223
Defendant:
MATTLEMAN, WEINROTH & MILLER, P.C., BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Plaintiff:
JOLA BRONSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Bank of New York, Mellon v. Hegedus et al
as 1:2018cv01372
Defendant:
James A. Hegedus and Virginia Hegedus
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York, Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MORGAN v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A. et al
as 2:2018cv03671
Defendant:
CWALT, INCORPORATED, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, BANK OF AMERICA N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HOLDER et al v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2018cv13095
Plaintiff:
DAVID HOLDER and CHARLA HOLDER
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
AUSTIN v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
as 2:2018cv12917
Defendant:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Plaintiff:
CARLTON AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
SHAHZAD v. M&T BANK et al
as 3:2018cv12440
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE, M&T BANK, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON and others
Plaintiff:
AMRIT SHAHZAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
BONET v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv11794
Defendant:
JEAN E. STANFIELD, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, STERN & EISENBERG, PC and others
Plaintiff:
EMILIO JEREMIAH BONET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
