Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 68 of 68
Sorace v. UNUM Group, Inc.
as 3:2009cv01056
Plaintiff: Wendy Sorace
Defendant: UNUM Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor Plaintiff
LIEGNER, M.D. V. UNUM GROUP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00866
Defendant: UNUM GROUP
Plaintiff: JOANNE E. LIEGNER, M.D.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
PLAZA-PONTE v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv00004
Plaintiff: MARIO PLAZA-PONTE, M.D.
Defendant: PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
IZZO v. UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv01504
Plaintiff: LARRY IZZO
Defendant: UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
LACOUTURE et al v. WEST PENN ALLEGHENY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv01292
Plaintiff: DAWNA L. LACOUTURE, DAWNA L. LACOUTURE, DAWNA L. LACOUTURE and others
Defendant: WEST PENN ALLEGHENY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., THE WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INTEGRATED DELIVERY CORPORATION and UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Defendant
CIARROCCHI v. UNUM GROUP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01704
Plaintiff: ENRICIO J. CIARROCCHI
Defendant: UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Defendant
MOIDEL v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2008cv00344
Plaintiff: EDWARD C. MOIDEL
Defendant: UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
MARSICO v. THE UNUM GROUP et al
as 2:2007cv01482
Plaintiff: LOUIS S. MARSICO
Defendant: THE UNUM GROUP, UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION, PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?