Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 92
Solis v. Derrickson et al
as 1:2010mc00255
Plaintiff: Hilda L. Solis
Defendant: Robert Derrickson, RRD Land Clearing Inc. and RRD Clearing Inc. Health Plan
SOLIS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72659
Plaintiff: LUIS SOLIS
Defendant: FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOLIS v. ROBERTS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010mc00185
Plaintiff: HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant: JOHN ROBERTS, MARA SCANLON ROBERTS, STERLING PRINTING AND GRAPHICS, INC and others
SOLIS et al v. MORGAN
as 2:2010cv02409
Plaintiff: HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant: MICHAEL G. MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv01062
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SOLIE v. ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv61438
Plaintiff: PRESCOTT SOLIE
Defendant: ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION , INC. ACANDS, CERTAINTEED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOLIS V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35007
Plaintiff: ERNESTO SOLIS
Defendant: UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
KOZIERACHI v. SOLIS
as 2:2009cv06164
Plaintiff: SIGMUND J. KOZIERACHI
Defendant: HILDA SOLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Solis v. Slocum et al
as 3:2009cv02490
Plaintiff: Hilda L. Solis
Defendant: Scott Slocum, Dalton Mechanical Services, Inc. and Dalton Mechanical Simple IRA Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Solis v. Woronowicz et al
as 3:2009cv02365
Plaintiff: Hilda L. Solis
Defendant: Raymond Woronowicz and The Business Alliance, Inc. Simple IRA Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?