Cases 71 - 80 of 163
Davidson et al v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2018mc00033
Petitioner:
Thomas Davidson , Todd Cleary , Eric Siegal and others
Respondent:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
MILLS et al v. APPLE INC.
as 3:2018cv00780
Plaintiff:
JUDY MILLS , JUDITH DEAN , CARLA COMPAGNONE and others
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ironworks Patents, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01399
Plaintiff:
Ironworks Patents, LLC
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PATEY v. APPLE INC. et al
as 2:2017cv06191
Plaintiff:
MARY ANN PATEY
Defendant:
APPLE INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal- Personal Injury
MISHIEV v. APPLE INC.
as 3:2017cv04435
Plaintiff:
TONY MISHIEV
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
INVT SPE LLC v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2017cv03738
Plaintiff:
INVT SPE LLC
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Universal Secure Registry LLC v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00585
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Visa Inc. and Visa U.S.A. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Universal Secure Registry LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
In re: Intel Corporation
as 1:2005md01717
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Phil Paul
3Rd Party Defendant:
Apple Inc. and Ingram Micro Inc.
Defendant:
Avnet, Inc. and Clerk Jeffery N. Luthi
Not Yet Classified:
Nancy Wolfe, Charles Dupraz, Brian Weiner and others
Petitioner:
The National Plaintiffs Group
Intervenor:
Dow Jones & Co., Inc., Computer & Communications Industry Association, New York Times Company and others
Special Master:
SPECIAL MASTER Vincent J. Poppiti, -SM-
In Re:
Intel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Prowire LLC v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2017cv00223
Plaintiff:
Prowire LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
