Cases 71 - 77 of 77
In Re: Employee Benefit
as 08-1777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BARE, DAVID BOROS, CYNTHIA BRANDES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AIG LIFE HOLDINGS INC, FKA Amer Gen Corp, AIG LIFE INS CO, AMER INTL GRP INC and others
Defendant:
SEABURY & SMITH INC, FRANK F. HAACK & ASSOCIATES, GALLAGHER BENEFIT SERVICES and others
CORRELL v. CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE et al
as 3:2008cv01104
Plaintiff:
JARRELL CORRELL
Defendant:
CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE and CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re: Employee Benefit Ins.
as 08-1455
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE MORAN, CHRISTOPHER BARE, DAVID BOROS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AIG LIFE HOLDINGS INC, FKA Amer Gen Corp, AIG LIFE INS CO, AMER INTL GRP INC and others
Defendant:
FRANK F. HAACK & ASSOCIATES, GALLAGHER BENEFIT SERVICES, O'NEIL FINNEGAN & JORDAN INSURANCE AGENCY INC and others
Not Party:
REINSURANCE ASSN
MCGUINESS v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 5:2008cv00735
Plaintiff:
HARRIET MCGUINESS
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, CIGNA HEALTHCARE BENEFITS, INC., CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HILL v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2007cv01706
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE L. HILL
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Bosworth v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
as 3:2007cv01575
Plaintiff:
Scott Bosworth
Defendant:
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. NUNEZ et al
as 1:2007cv00110
Plaintiff:
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
TERRY NUNEZ, MIRIAM MISTRETTA and ARLENE PARSONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
