Cases 71 - 80 of 87
SCARIANO v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES INC et al
as 2:2012cv01299
Plaintiff:
DELORES SCARIANO
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES INC and KONE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Banks et al v. FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound, Dougless Williams, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. Wagner et al
as 1:2011cv00934
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
Wagner, Dixon, Donna Zickefiose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
A. Whitaker, Stevens, J. Tenor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORMAN et al v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
as 2:2010cv01412
Plaintiff:
PEARL GORMAN and GERALD GORMAN
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
EMERICK v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES INC
as 2:2010cv05418
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH EMERICK
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EFL PARTNERS V v. PASQUARELLO et al
as 2:2010cv03569
Plaintiff:
EFL PARTNERS V
Defendant:
MICHAEL PASQUARELLO and SHERMAN, SILVERSTEIN, KOHL, ROSE & PODOLSKY, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOHL v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv68797
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , UNITED STATES MINERAL PRODUCTS COMPANY , W.R. GRACE & COMPANY - CONN. and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE J KOHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOHLS v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67893
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS H. KOHLS
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
