Cases 71 - 80 of 14,327
SPANGENBERG v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv05023
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
KAYLEE SPANGENBERG
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROOKS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv04932
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
RHONDA BROOKS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Katie Sczesny, et al v. Philip Murphy, et al
as 24-1676
Plaintiff:
KATIE SCZESNY, JAIME RUMFIELD, DEBRA HAGEN and others
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, in his official and personal capacity and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE COVERED PERSON et al v. THE LIFETIME VALUE CO. LLC et al
as 3:2024cv04850
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE COVERED PERSON, JANE DOE-1, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, JANE DOE-2, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER and others
Defendant:
THE LIFETIME VALUE CO. LLC, BEENVERIFIED, INC., BEENVERIFIED, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
ELLSWORTH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv04763
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN ELLSWORTH and HENRY ELLSWORTH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WHITMORE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv04695
Plaintiff:
LISA WHITMORE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC) and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICE AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAIN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al.
as 3:2024cv04570
Plaintiff:
JANICE CAIN and MELVIN CAIN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1602
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in her official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Theresa Laws v. Borough of Lansdale, et al
as 24-1562
Plaintiff:
THERESA MARIA LAWS
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LANSDALE, LANDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Municipal liability under Monell, CHIEF MICHAEL B. TRAIL, in personal and official capacities and others
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1594
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk, MARY H. MELFI, in her capacity as Hunterdon County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Appellant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEMOCRATIC ORGANIZATION, LAURA ALI, NEW JERSEY REPUBLICAN CHAIRS ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
FULOP FOR GOVERNOR, ELECTION LAW CLINIC AT HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NEW JERSEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
