Cases 71 - 80 of 202
VOUTHAS et al v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv01038
Plaintiff:
DIMITRIOS VOUTHAS and JACKLYN K. VOUTHAS
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. , CHRISTOPHER BARKER , CHRISTOPHER MORZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUPIN et al v. ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT COMPANY et al
as 1:2016cv09361
Plaintiff:
MARK JUPIN and LISA ELWELL-JUPIN
Defendant:
ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT COMPANY, ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT CO. , ASPLUNDH TREE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
DONOGHUE et al v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04742
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DONOGHUE , ROBERT KICKLIGHTER , THOMAS ADAMS and others
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., TESINC LLC, EVANS SPLICING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LELAJ v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. et al
as 1:2016cv05209
Plaintiff:
ARETI LELAJ
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
HAYES v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04328
Plaintiff:
CARLENA HAYES
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EQUIFAX and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
KEENON v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
as 2:2016cv04124
Plaintiff:
EMMA L. KEENON
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
