Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DOWDEN et al v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv11381
Plaintiff:
DONALD DOWDEN and THE ESTATE OF SHERI DOWDEN LEE
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maple et al v. Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control et al
as 1:2022cv00857
Plaintiff:
Anterine Maple, the Estate of Zion George, Destiny Deluca and others
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Frank M. Piorko, Charles E. Williams, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOWDEN v. RIDDELL, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00406
Plaintiff:
COREY DOWDEN
Defendant:
RIDDELL, INC. , ALL AMERICAN SPORTS CORPORATION and RIDDELL SPORTS GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILLIARD et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv00961
Plaintiff:
DALTON HILLIARD , ANDREA HILLIARD , NORMAN F. HODGINS, JR. and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, RIDDELL, INC, ALL AMERICAN SPORTS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOWDEN et al v. A.C. & S., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61386
Plaintiff:
WILLARD F. DOWDEN and JESSIE A. DOWDEN
Defendant:
A.C. & S., INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , FIBREBOARD CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOWDEN v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE et al
as 2:2010cv06019
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DOWDEN
Defendant:
CITY OF EAST ORANGE, EAST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, PHILIP DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOWDEN v. ORBCOMM INC. et al
as 2:2007cv04590
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE DOWDEN
Defendant:
ORBCOMM INC., JEROME B. EISENBERG, ROBERT G. COSTANTINI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
