Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv13219
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pruden v. Psychiatrist Alterman et al
as 3:2008cv00916
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pruden
Defendant:
Psychiatrist Alterman, Psychiatrist Bower, Psychiatrist Kern and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pruden v. Medical Director, et al
as 08-2124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD PRUDEN
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR, Camp Hill, Cresson, Graterford, Smithfield, Houtzdale, NOLAN, CRESSON DOCTOR and others
Ronald Pruden v. Schuylkill Cty Dr, et al
as 08-1927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD PRUDEN
Defendant:
SCHUYLKILL CTY DR, CAMP HILL SOU & DRS, NOLAN and others
Ronald Pruden v. SCI Cresson Doctors, et al
as 08-1924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD PRUDEN
Defendant:
SCI CRESSON DOCTORS, SCI GRATERFORD MED, ALTERMAN and others
Pruden v. Medical Directors et al
as 3:2008cv00562
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pruden
Defendant:
Medical Directors, Nolan, Cresson Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruden v. Schuillkill County Doctor et al
as 3:2007cv01847
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pruden
Defendant:
Schuillkill County Doctor, Camp Hill SOU & Doctors, Cresson Ms. Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruden v. SCI - Cresson Doctors et al
as 3:2007cv01831
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pruden
Defendant:
SCI - Cresson Doctors, SCI - Graterford Doctors, Dr. Alterman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruden v. Bower et al
as 3:2007cv00778
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pruden
Defendant:
Dr. Bower, Dr. Brezovskaya and Dr. Alterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
